Peabody Energy Corp. said Wednesday that it has increased its stake in Australia’s Macarthur Coal Ltd. beyond 90 percent — the point that it can require other stockholders to tender their shares.
The St. Louis-based coal producer is also raising its offer for Macarthur as previously agreed to do if its stake in the mining company exceeded the 90-percent threshold, bringing the total value of the deal to almost $5 billion.
Peabody will now pay 16.25 Australian dollars for each Macarthur share, a slight bump from its previous offer of 16 Australian dollars bad credit payday advance.
Gregory H. Boyce, Peabody’s chief executive, said acquiring 100-percent of Macarthur “brings clear strategic and financial benefits.”
Peabody “looks forward to completing operational improvements, accelerating the realization of synergies and advancing Macarthur’s growth pipeline,” Boyce said.
Fierce competition for top-tier credit card customers appears to be leading some banks to look in elsewhere for new business: borrowers with spotty credit histories.
Data shows that more new cards went to consumers with less-than-stellar credit scores in the third quarter, while fewer new cards went to those with the best scores.
In the three months ended Sept. 30, credit reporting agency TransUnion found that 25.2 percent of the new card accounts went to consumers with a score below 700.
That was up from 23 percent of cards going to riskier borrowers in the same quarter of 2010.
That translates into almost a quarter million more cards going to consumers who have had some trouble with credit in the past, according to Ezra Becker, vice president of research and consulting in TransUnion’s financial services business unit.
And since TransUnion found that the overall number of cards opened during the quarter was essentially flat from a year ago, that means those were cards that did not go to more creditworthy consumers. In fact, the number of new card accounts opened by borrowers with scores of 800 or better slipped to 45.9 percent, from 49.7 percent a year ago.
The findings were based on the VantageScore system for measuring creditworthiness developed by TransUnion and its peers Experian and Equifax as an alternative to the better-known FICO score. VantageScore says its system, which uses a scale of 501 to 990 and awards higher scores to the least risky borrowers, is used by the top five credit card issuers in the country.
Like FICO, VantageScore’s ratings are based a number of factors regarding an individual’s past use of credit, including their history of making on-time payments, keeping balances below credit limits and the length of their credit history.
Scores around 700 would merit a “C” on the VantageScore scale, which implies that those borrowers had some problems making payments or ran up balances in the past.
Opening up new credit to struggling consumers is an important step. A year ago, TransUnion said about 8 million people had left the credit card market in the prior 12 months, either by choice or because their cards were shut down.
The uptick in lending to consumers who have had trouble with payments in the past “counteracts everything that’s been happening in the last few years,” said Bill Hardekopf, CEO of the card comparison site LowCards.com. He noted that demand is high for consumers in that group because of the dearth of available credit in recent years.
Meanwhile, card companies have been pushing ever-more-enticing offers to consumers with the best scores _ beefing up rewards, trimming interest rates and lengthening the time for no- or low-interest balance transfers. About 80 percent of all new card offers go to those with the top credit scores, according to market research firm Synovate.
But those same top-tier borrowers aren’t trying to open as many new accounts or increase their balances faxless payday advance. “They have plenty of credit available to them,” Becker said, noting that card users have been paying down their balances. In the third quarter, TransUnion found the average combined balance on bank-issued credit cards _ MasterCard, Visa, American Express and Discover_ fell 4.1 percent to $4,762, from $4,964 last year.
Data from credit card companies also shows that while the most affluent consumers are using their cards more, they’re also paying off their balances in full each month.
That means that to increase profits in their card businesses, banks need to find new borrowers who will pay higher interest rates and are more likely to carry balances each month.
“If financial institutions are going to grow, eventually they’re going to have to dip their toes into the water of riskier borrowers,” said Greg McBride, senior financial analyst for Bankrate.com, which tracks credit offers.
Another factor that’s likely playing into more willingness to lend to consumers with lower scores is that there are more individuals on the riskier end of the scale due to the lengthy economic downturn, high unemployment and ongoing foreclosure crisis, noted Bruce McClary, a spokesman for ClearPoint Credit Counseling Solutions. “Sooner or later the people who got bumped out of the credit world have to start re-establishing credit,” he said.
One problem is that the increase in higher-risk borrowers also had an immediate impact on the rate of late payments during the quarter.
TransUnion found that the rate of payments late by 90 days or more _ known in the industry as the delinquency rate _ rose to 0.71 percent, from 0.60 percent in the second quarter.
That’s still down from 0.83 percent in the third quarter a year ago, and a long way off from the 1.32 percent peak in delinquency recorded in the first quarter of 2009.
Although the delinquency rate in the third quarter was still below the historical norm _ the second-quarter rate was the lowest seen since 1994 _ it marks the first quarter-over-quarter increase in almost two years.
“When you have such low delinquency, there’s generally only one direction you can go,” Becker observed. Plus, lenders must take risks if they want to earn anything. If lenders wanted to achieve zero delinquency, he said, they would have to stop lending.
The expansion of new card offers to riskier borrowers also present an interesting bit of timing for the industry, notes Hardekopf.
Card companies “want to get these cards in their hands so they have the ability to use them during the holiday season,” he said. “The time when we all put more on our cards is the fourth quarter.”
As the Occupy Wall Street protests draw attention to the struggles of young adults, among others, some parents are determined to spare their children the burden of college loans.
Many worry about the college funds they’ve been able to build. Last quarter, the average mutual fund that invests in stocks lost 17 percent. The average 529 college savings plan, which invests in a mixture of stocks and bonds, lost 8.9 percent, according to a recent Morningstar 529 plan study.
But if you’ve been worried about your losses, you may have more control than you think about the outcome if you pay attention to a few details.
For example, some 529 plans charge high fees and give you little in return. And some require you to get help from a financial adviser, but often parents and grandparents can do better on their own simply by investing directly in a top-quality 529 plan.
As consumers become savvy about their 529 college savings options, they are moving money from expensive and weak 529 plans into those that grow money more effectively. During a recent 12-month period, plans sold by advisers, which are often more expensive, lost more than a percentage point of market share relative to those sold directly to individuals, according to Morningstar cash advance companies.
But how do you know if you are getting a good deal on a 529?
Start your analysis by finding out from your state’s department of education if your home state offers a 529 and whether you get a tax break by investing in it.
Some states will allow you to invest in any 529 outside your state and get a break on your taxes. But most give you a tax benefit only if you choose the 529 in your state. The usual benefit: You can subtract the amount of money you invest in a 529 from your taxable income when you do your tax return. That’s a good deal.
Some states, however, are even more benevolent. Indiana gives its residents a credit of 20 percent on the first $5,000 they invest a year in their state 529. People from Indiana can save up to $1,040 on a $5,000 investment, said Morningstar. Maine gives residents a $500 grant if they open a 529 before their child’s first birthday. Other states such as Illinois offer less
Who feels like a panini?
Sorry, this column isn’t about the panini you eat, rather the one you are — that is if you are a member of the sandwich generation with aging parents or other family members who need assistance and children, often into their mid to late 20s, still partially or completely dependent financially.
In 2002, Statistics Canada estimated that 2.6 million Canadians between the ages of 45 and 64 had children under 25 living with them and approximately 27 per cent of them were also providing some kind of elder care. After the financial collapse and recession the trend has accelerated.
Many of my friends are being sandwiched, as am I. My youngest daughter, nearly 26, is deaf. She’s still at college and may require financial help for some time to come. Until recently, my parents also needed considerable care. My mother died in 2009 and, fortunately, my father is relatively healthy and able to live in a nice retirement home. But now and then, the needs of daughter and father collide with my own busy life and I feel pulled in a dozen directions.
Most of those sandwiched between two generations are baby boomers, the first of whom started collecting their old-age pension in 2011. The advancing wave of this group is bringing with it a whole set of new financial challenges. “My daughter and son have student loans of $42,000 between the two of them. Despite their best efforts they’re semi-employed and living in an expensive city (Toronto),” Helen, 59, emailed recently. Helen is widowed and lives in a small northern Ontario town where jobs are limited. “I have enough to retire in a couple of years but not if I help them, especially if their situations don’t improve pretty fast. But I can’t see turning my back on them.”
The choices being forced on the sandwich generation often leave the caregivers feeling damned if they do or don’t. Should I stop RRSP contributions to help my family? Do I postpone my retirement? Will my employer let me go if I take time off to care for my parents? Should I withdraw from my savings? Do I kick out my kids so I can downsize?
Many of the difficulties facing sandwiched boomers are magnified for entrepreneurs. Even with great employees the buck stops with the boss and stepping away is rarely a satisfactory option.
Winnipeg-based bestselling tax author and president of the Knowledge Bureau, Evelyn Jacks juggled a successful business while being the primary caregiver of two ailing family members and also involved with the care of two others. All four died over an 18-month period. “Caring for the sick and the dying is difficult and exhausting and so sharing the journey with your support network is very important,” she says in retrospect.
“A strategic, consistent and all-inclusive communications plan within the family is very important. When everyone stays in the loop in an orderly way — we used email a lot to cover all the time zones — everyone can seamlessly step in as required. It also means everyone needs to work hard to stay healthy — physically and emotionally — in very stressful times.”
Being sandwiched between the needs of two and sometimes three generations isn’t a new phenomenon. My parents brought “the grannies,” as we called them, from England while I was young. One drank like a fish and gave away money to whomever asked and the other frequently wandered off only to be found settled on someone’s porch happily singing “It’s a Long Way to Tipperary”.
But the extended care-giving facing the boomers is unique because this generation is so large, our parents are living longer and our children carry a far higher student debt load than past generations. According to a 2010 Vanier Institute of the Family Study, university graduates have $18,000 in student loans, not including family debt or lines of credit.
To compound the problem young adults are also earning less relatively. Statistics Canada figures show that the wages of those 20 to 34, across all levels of education levels declined significantly in the 1980s and the trend has continued to present day, though at a slower pace.
These financial and emotional stresses prompted Credit Canada, the country’s leading not-for-profit credit counselling charity, to choose the sandwich generation as the theme for its fifth Credit Education Week — part of November’s Financial Literacy Money, which kicks off on Nov. 14.
“Credit Canada has seen more and more people trying to support their children and aging parents who don’t have the income to support themselves while struggling to pay their own bills including their children’s education,” notes executive director Laurie Campbell.
Credit Education Week Canada has published a very useful magazine, The Sandwich Generation. Among some of the do’s and don’ts to avoid being crippled emotionally and financially:
1. Set up a power of attorney
2. Update wills and ensure health-care directives are in place
3. Consolidate the debts and assets of the elderly to make management simpler
4. Don’t bleed your own savings, especially RRSPs, or increase your debt load (except in the direst circumstances) for the young or the old
5. Don’t allow unemployed kids to hang out at home doing nothing.
6. Don’t excuse siblings or other relatives from their responsibility
Ameren Missouri recently signaled plans to slash its energy efficiency budget for electricity customers next year, arguing that reducing energy use was shortchanging its shareholders.
But energy efficiency rebates for natural gas customers are staying intact, at least for the next year.
On Wednesday, the Missouri Public Service Commission voted unanimously to deny Ameren’s request to eliminate rebates on energy-saving items available to its 126,000 natural gas customers.
St. Louis-based Ameren agreed at the beginning of the year to fund rebates for an array of natural gas-saving items, from insulation to Energy Star doors, weather stripping and water heaters. The agreement was part of a broader settlement that allowed the utility to boost gas delivery rates by $5.6 million.
But Ameren sought to eliminate many of the most popular rebates soon afterward on grounds that they weren’t cost-effective. The cost of the improvements did not pay off in energy savings, the company argued.
Consumer advocates at the state Office of Public Counsel and Department of Natural Resources balked at the request because the utility had agreed to fund the program through the end of 2012 and later to have a third party evaluate the results low fee pay day loans.
The PSC ordered Ameren to maintain the natural gas efficiency programs following a hearing last month. The commission said ending the programs prematurely “will undercut the effort to have the agreed-upon usage data necessary to evaluate the programs.”
The agreement that Ameren signed requires the utility to fund the energy efficiency programs for three years at an amount reaching one-half percent of gross operating revenue for expenditures on cost-effective programs.
According to the PSC order, Ameren’s own evidence presented in last month’s hearing showed the utility knew that, using its own tests, some of the rebates weren’t cost-effective at the time it agreed to fund them.
Utility representatives declined to discuss the commission’s decision.
While the PSC will require Ameren to continue funding its gas efficiency program as it had promised, regulators have no similar signed agreement to require the utility to maintain electric efficiency programs.
Let’s wait and see.
That’s likely to be the message from the Federal Reserve on Wednesday, when its two-day policy meeting ends. Few expect any bold new steps to be announced.
Fed policymakers likely want to gauge the impact of action they’ve taken recently to keep interest rates low. The Fed has breathing room because the economy and stock markets have strengthened enough to allay fears of another recession.
After their September meeting, the policymakers said they would shuffle the Fed’s investment portfolio to try to further reduce long-term interest rates. And in their previous meeting in August, they had said they plan to keep short-term rates near zero until at least mid-2013 unless the economy improved.
“They know they are running out of tools, so they don’t want to employ another one unless they have to,” said David Wyss, former chief economist at Standard & Poor’s.
At its last meeting, the Fed left open the possibility of taking additional action to try to help the economy. One option is to further explain the steps it has already taken and their purposes. Another would be to launch a third program of bond purchases.
But the Fed remains deeply divided over what, if any, action to take, which is another reason economists don’t expect any major announcements this week.
The actions taken in August and September were adopted on 7-3 votes, the most dissents in nearly 20 years.
Three regional bank presidents _ Richard Fisher of Dallas, Charles Plosser of Philadelphia and Narayana Kocherlakota of Minneapolis _ all voted no. They have expressed concerns that the Fed’s policies could lead to high inflation later.
On the other hand, four policymakers are worried that the Fed might not be doing enough. Vice Chair Janet Yellen, Governor Daniel Tarullo, Chicago Fed President Charles Evans and New York Fed President William Dudley have said the economy is at risk and might need more support.
“I have never seen the Fed more deeply divided than it is at this moment,” said David Jones, head of DMJ Advisors and the author of books on the Fed.
At its meeting in September, the Fed stopped short of expanding its portfolio of investments. Instead, it opted to shuffle $400 billion of its investments to try to lower long-term rates.
But two officials pushed for bolder action, according to minutes of the meeting. The members discussed more bond-buying. Some said it should remain an option.
A brighter outlook for the economy has given the Fed more room to wait. The economy grew at an annual rate of 2.5 percent in the July-September period _ the best quarterly performance in a year.
That’s strong enough to show that the economy isn’t about to slide into recession. Still, growth would have to be nearly twice as high _ consistently _ to make a major dent in the unemployment rate, which has been stuck at 9.1 percent for three straight months.
Stocks have rallied of late. Even after a drop of nearly 2.5 percent Monday, the Standard & Poor’s 500 stock index in October notched its best one-month showing since December 1991.
European leaders have also announced a debt agreement that could help prevent a financial catastrophe on the continent. Still, even if it does, many analysts don’t think Europe can avoid another recession.
Many economists think the Fed will hold off on new action until its December meeting or early next year. The next step could be further clarity on its interest-rate policy.
Evans has proposed that the Fed set benchmarks for raising rates. For example, it could agree not to raise short-term rates until unemployment fell below 7 percent or the outlook for inflation exceeded 3 percent. The unemployment rate has hovered around 9 percent for more than two years, and the Fed’s inflation outlook is under 2 percent.
Yellen, who heads a Fed panel that is examining ways to improve the central bank’s communications, says the idea should be examined. But she cautioned that such benchmarks could confuse investors.
She has suggested that the Fed could add further guidance when it provides its economic forecasts four times a year. The forecast offers estimates for growth, unemployment and inflation. It does not forecast interest rates.
Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, said that adding a Fed forecast on the federal funds rate, its main policy lever, would reassure investors about when it might move interest rates.
“They have given investors more clarity about the timing of future rates, but including an actual forecast of when rates might change would help bring rates down further,” Zandi said.
Yahoo
The leaders of South Korea and Japan agreed Wednesday to expand the size of a currency swap deal and push to resume stalled free trade negotiations, as Tokyo returned looted Korean royal documents in a goodwill gesture.
Seoul and Tokyo have close economic ties and are key U.S. allies in Asia, but many older Koreans still harbor deep resentment against Japan over its 35-year colonial occupation of Korea that ended in 1945. Ties suffered this year because of a territorial dispute and differences over the occupation.
On Wednesday, the leaders of the two countries agreed in a meeting in Seoul that they would expand the size of their total currency swap arrangements to $70 billion from the current $13 billion as a backstop against global economic turmoil. The measures consists of dollar-local currency and bilateral won-yen arrangements.
Swaps allow one central bank to borrow a currency from another, offering an equivalent amount of its own as collateral.
“We reached the agreement … based on a belief that we should strengthen our financial and currency cooperation to preemptively stabilize the financial market as the world’s economic uncertainty is deepening,” South Korean President Lee Myung-bak said at a news conference with Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda.
Lee and Noda said they also agreed to bolster efforts to resume stalled negotiations on signing a free trade agreement.
The two countries began free trade talks in 2003, but the negotiations remain stalled over trade barriers on agriculture and fish. The South Korea-Japan deal drew renewed attention after the U.S. Congress ratified a free trade accord with South Korea this month. That deal still needs approval from South Korea’s parliament fast payday loan.
In an effort to improve ties, Noda repatriated five volumes of Korean royal documents that his country took away during its rule.
“The return should be seen as a gift with a political intention,” Seoul National University international relations professor Park Cheol-hee said.
The documents are part of 1,205 historical volumes that Japan agreed to give back to South Korea when Noda’s predecessor, Naoto Kan, met with Lee last year. A Japanese official traveling with Noda told reporters in Seoul that Tokyo is to return the remaining books by Dec.10. The official declined to be named because of office policy.
Noda told Lee that he would seek to return the remanning books at an appropriate time, according to South Korea’s presidential office.
The books’ return came two months after South Korea banned three conservative Japanese lawmakers from entering the country after they arrived at a Seoul airport with a plan to travel near islets at the center of territorial and historical disputes between the countries.
The two countries are also at odds over Seoul’s offer to hold talks on Japan’s compensation of Korean women forced into sexual slavery for Japan during its colonial rule. Japan declined, saying the matter was settled by a 1965 treaty that normalized ties between Japan and South Korea.
“I stated several times that moving toward the future without forgetting history is the basis of South Korea-Japan relations,” Lee said.
Noda told reporters the issue of sex slaves wasn’t discussed during Wednesday’s meeting.
French luxury powerhouse LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton said Tuesday that its revenue grew strongly in the third quarter after a the purchase of jewelry giant Bulgari and a rebound in Japan.
The company behind Dom Perignon champagne and Marc Jacobs said sales rose to euro6.01 billion ($8.28 billion), up 19 percent from the previous quarter.
The biggest jump was in the jewelry and watches division, which doubled its sales from last quarter to euro636 million.
The overall sales were up 17 percent from the same quarter a year earlier payday loans.
The quarter also benefited from strong sales in Hong Kong and Macau and a return to luxury consumption in Japan after its devastating earthquake and tsunami.
LVMH said it was confident that sales would remain strong for the rest of the year.
A New York businessman called a “mini-Madoff” because he was arrested weeks after the billion-dollar swindler was sentenced Friday to 25 years in prison and ordered to pay $179 million in restitution _ money he doesn’t have.
Nicholas Cosmo, who apologized as he was sentenced, has had a gambling problem since high school, his lawyer said. He was arrested in January 2009 and pleaded guilty last year to mail and wire fraud.
“I’m going to be working until they put me in the grave,” said one of the victims, Ellen Gabriel, of Yaphank, N.Y., who did not address the court but wept throughout the hearing. The hairdresser said she lost $130,000 _ “my entire life savings.”
Gabriel added that she had researched before investing: “It’s not like we were stupid.”
Four victims did address the court.
“Everything that these people said about me, for the most part, is true,” said Cosmo, the former head of the Long Island-based Agape World and Agape Merchant Advance in New York City.
Agape solicited investors to fund short loans to help companies get temporary financing. Cosmo promised up to 80 percent returns but admitted using investors’ money for personal investments.
“It wasn’t my intention to ever hurt anyone. But I hurt them and I stand here as a guilty man,” Cosmo told the court. “I am truly sorry from the bottom of my heart. I know that probably falls on deaf ears. There’s not a day that goes by that I am not ashamed for what I have done.”
Unlike the more notorious Bernard Madoff, who admitted cheating charities, celebrities and institutional investors out of billions, Cosmo targeted mainly blue-collar workers.
“He preyed on people’s personal relationships and trust,” said Assistant U.S. Attorney Demetri Jones, who had urged a 40-year term. “The victims are everyman _ generations of families.”
The more than 4,000 victims include teachers, police officers, firefighters, nurses and construction workers, Jones said. “They’re not banks. They’re not corporations. They’re people.”
Investors believed they would make returns as high as 80 percent a year from interest collected on short-term loans to businesses. But an investigation revealed that “much of the money paid back to investors … was actually money provided by subsequent investors” _ a Ponzi scheme.
Cosmo also spent 21 months in federal prison for a 1999 mail fraud conviction.
He had been free on $1.25 million bail until October 2009, when U.S. District Judge Denis Hurley revoked bail after finding Cosmo had violated bail conditions barring him from access to any computer or the Internet.
Cosmo “will bend the rules if he feels it will serve his interests,” the judge said at the time. “He is unlikely to abide by any condition or conditions of his release.”
Powered by WordPress -- XHTML 1.0